How often did NZ political parties agree on bills in the last parliament?

Compare party bill voting from the last parliament.

Question No. 10 to Minister

Wednesday 10 October 2007 Hansard source (external site)

MarkRON MARK (NZ First) Link to this

I raise a point of order, Madam Speaker. I am seeking your advice. In your comments to me on the point of order I took, you suggested that I should refer to the Standing Orders and understand them a little better. I am looking at Standing Orders 115 and 116 in respect of offensive and disorderly words and personal reflections. Paragraph 115 states: “If any offensive or disorderly words are used, whether by a member who is speaking or by a member who is present, the Speaker intervenes.” The next one, paragraph 116, “Personal reflections”, states: “A member may not make an imputation of improper motives against a member, an offensive reference to a member’s private affairs or a personal reflection against a member.” There is no further statement there giving a caveat as you had suggested. I have looked at Speakers’ Rulings and I cannot find the statement that the offence must be taken by the member to whom the comment was aimed. All I can read is that the Speaker intervenes. If you can help me and steer me to the right Speaker’s ruling, or the right Standing Order, then I might better understand these Standing Orders going forward. I would be extremely grateful.

WilsonMadam SPEAKER Link to this

I thank the member for his comments. There are no vicarious objections that can be taken on a personal reflection by others. I am happy to speak and give the member some guidance outside the Chamber on Standing Orders and, of course, Speakers’ rulings.

Oct 2007
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
12345
89101112
1516171819
2223242526
29303112