How often did NZ political parties agree on bills in the last parliament?

Compare party bill voting from the last parliament.

Urgency

Tuesday 27 October 2009 (advance copy) Hansard source (external site)

BrownleeHon GERRY BROWNLEE (Leader of the House) Link to this

I move, That urgency be accorded the passing through their remaining stages of the Criminal Investigations (Bodily Samples) Amendment Bill, the Gangs and Organised Crimes Bill, the Whakarewarewa and Roto-a-Tamaheke Vesting Bill, and any bills into which any of those bills may be divided; the introduction and first reading of the Dairy Industry Restructuring (Raw Milk Pricing Methods) Amendment Bill; the second reading of the Settlement Systems, Futures, and Emissions Units Bill; the second reading of the Biosecurity Amendment Bill; and the introduction and first reading of Government bills.

TischMr DEPUTY SPEAKER Link to this

You mentioned the second reading of the Settlement Systems, Futures, and Emissions Units Bill; what about the Committee of the whole House?

BrownleeHon GERRY BROWNLEE Link to this

No. The second reading of the Settlement Systems, Futures, and Emissions Units Bill, and the second reading of the Biosecurity Amendment Bill—those were the two points I made there.

The Government is taking the opportunity to gain some extra hours to work on its business. It is largely driven by the fact that tomorrow should be a members’ day, but those in the House will remember that a few weeks ago we had a members’ day that concluded very, very early. That was largely because a number of bills had been postponed. When we look at the Order Paper and at the business to be carried out, we see that it is all time-weighted, so the postponement of bills means that the House finishes somewhat earlier. At the moment, there are no fewer than six postponed bills on the members’ part of the Order Paper. So we are in a bit of dire situation, in my opinion. Members have the opportunity to debate their own bills on a particular day, but members’ own actions are preventing that course of action from taking place. So the Government is happy to step in and fill the void.

To formalise that, I say that urgency is being moved in order to gain extra sitting hours so as to enable a range of Government business to be dealt with by the House before rising for a short adjournment.

HughesHon DARREN HUGHES (Senior Whip—Labour) Link to this

I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. The Leader of the House had previously signalled the bills that were going to be part of his motion, but I notice he said the first readings of any other Government bills that were introduced. I wonder whether he could give the House an explanation of that before we move to the vote.

BrownleeHon GERRY BROWNLEE (Leader of the House) Link to this

That is there as a standard precaution. It goes on the end of most urgency motions. I think the member is well aware of what the Government’s intentions are, and I would hope that the member understood that when the Government’s intentions have been previously signalled—

TischMr DEPUTY SPEAKER Link to this

I am happy with that understanding.

FitzsimonsJEANETTE FITZSIMONS (Green) Link to this

I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. I wonder whether the Leader of the House could assure the House that the Government has enough business to keep us going through urgency, and that it will not do as it did on the previous occasion and raise the House at 8.05 p.m., when we had thought we were here till midnight.

TischMr DEPUTY SPEAKER Link to this

This is not a debating point.

FitzsimonsJeanette Fitzsimons Link to this

It is a question.

TischMr DEPUTY SPEAKER Link to this

It is a question. Well, I will ask the Hon Gerry Brownlee to respond to the member.

BrownleeHon GERRY BROWNLEE (Leader of the House) Link to this

I think that really does indicate the dilemma that the Government has. The Government has no desire to have people cooped up in Parliament for all hours, debating a range of bills that, although we certainly want them to be sped through the House, ordinarily might not meet the criteria that the Government itself chooses to set down. However, last week we picked up an extra 4 hours on the Wednesday morning. Although the House did rise around 8 p.m., which facilitated a number of members of this House attending various important functions that they were obliged to attend, might I say that had we had members’ day we would not have had those 4 hours in the morning but we would likely still have lifted at around 5.55 p.m. on that particular Wednesday. All we are saying is that if members themselves wish to organise the Order Paper in a way that means that the House will not take advantage of the time set aside for members’ day, then the Government will fill the void.

Link to this

A party vote was called for on the question,

That urgency be accorded.

Ayes 69

Noes 53

Motion agreed to.

Oct 2009
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
28293012
56789
1213141516
1920212223
2627282930