How often did NZ political parties agree on bills in the last parliament?

Compare party bill voting from the last parliament.

Broadcasting, Digital—Regulatory Review

Thursday 7 May 2009 Hansard source (external site)

Shanks12. KATRINA SHANKS (National) Link to this
to the Minister of Broadcasting

What advice has he received from officials on the regulatory review of digital broadcasting?

ColemanHon Dr JONATHAN COLEMAN (Minister of Broadcasting) Link to this

After the election the Government asked officials to prepare a report that outlined the competition issues in broadcasting, based on work done up to that point on the regulatory review. Officials concluded that the current broadcasting environment appears workably competitive and that there are no compelling indications of future issues. It also noted that there is currently no strong case for the introduction of specific new regulations for the broadcasting sector.

ShanksKatrina Shanks Link to this

What action has the Minister taken in light of that advice?

ColemanHon Dr JONATHAN COLEMAN Link to this

The Government subsequently stopped further work on the regulatory review, saving up to $300,000 of public money in the process. We are now focusing our efforts on a forward-thinking programme of action in broadcasting. This includes an emphasis on contestable funding for public broadcasting, achieving the transition to digital switchover, and incorporating elements of the digital broadcasting review that align with this Government’s priorities. These include progressing work on post-digital switchover spectrum allocation, regional television broadcasting, and options for sensory-impaired viewers.

BurnsBrendon Burns Link to this

Can the Minister confirm that, in fact, the Ministry of Culture and Heritage, as part of that review, favoured amending the Telecommunications Act to include broadcasting, so as to “proactively manage risks relating to anti-competitive behaviour by Sky.”?

ColemanHon Dr JONATHAN COLEMAN Link to this

I note that that member has now been the Opposition spokesman on broadcasting for 6 months, and that is the very first question he has asked.

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

The Minister will resume his seat. There was not even the slightest attempt to address the question asked; it was simply a direct attack on the questioner. That is not acceptable under the Standing Orders of this Parliament, and the Minister should know that. I now ask the Minister to at least address the question.

ColemanHon Dr JONATHAN COLEMAN Link to this

I was just getting round to that. Basically, there was a range of advice there. We looked at it, and he is taking that—

MallardHon Trevor Mallard Link to this

I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker.

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

Point of order, the Hon Trevor Mallard.

ColemanHon Dr JONATHAN COLEMAN Link to this

—advice out of context.

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

I ask the member to resume his seat. I say to the Minister that he may not be a senior Minister, but he will obey the Standing Orders. When I call a point of order, for him to carry on is totally intolerable. I will not tolerate that. I have called a point of order here.

MallardHon Trevor Mallard Link to this

The point of order is a relatively simple one. The Minister commented on your ruling in his reply. That is forbidden, as well.

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

It is, and I noted it. I invite the Minister to answer the question succinctly.

ColemanHon Dr JONATHAN COLEMAN Link to this

I would just like to say that I could not actually hear your call for a point of order. I apologise, but I could not hear it with the acoustics, quite honestly.

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

I accept the apology.

ColemanHon Dr JONATHAN COLEMAN Link to this

A range of advice was given in that briefing. The member knows there is a context to that advice. He has picked out one small bit, but the broad thrust of the report is that there is no need to continue with the review, and that member knows it.

BurnsBrendon Burns Link to this

I seek leave to table the report of officials, entitled Television Broadcasting Competition Issues.

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

Leave is sought to table that document. Is there any objection? There is none.

Document, by leave, laid on the Table of the House.

BurnsBrendon Burns Link to this

I seek leave to table a paper by Peter Thompson from Unitec’s department of communications studies, entitled National’s Broadcasting Policy: Expedient Fictions, Inconvenient Truths.

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

Leave is sought to table that document. Is there any objection? There is objection.

ShanksKatrina Shanks Link to this

What other work is the Government progressing in broadcasting?

ColemanHon Dr JONATHAN COLEMAN Link to this

The Government plans to introduce legislation to enact the revised Radio New Zealand charter and will shortly introduce legislation to repeal the Television New Zealand Ltd (TVNZ) charter, which will release TVNZ from the unworkable dual mandate the previous Government shackled it with. Recently, publicly funded TVNZ 6 and TVNZ 7 were released to the Sky platform, opening up that content to a further 700,000 households. This Government believes in value for money, and it makes sense that if the public is paying for content, then the pool of viewers should be as large as possible.

May 2009
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
272829301
45678
1112131415
1819202122
2526272829