How often did NZ political parties agree on bills in the last parliament?

Compare party bill voting from the last parliament.

Climate Change—International Negotiations

Wednesday 20 June 2007 Hansard source (external site)

Chadwick5. STEVE CHADWICK (Labour—Rotorua) Link to this
to the Minister responsible for Climate Change Issues

What recent reports, if any, has he received on New Zealand’s role in international negotiations for much-needed agreement on climate change post-2012?

ParkerHon DAVID PARKER (Minister responsible for Climate Change Issues) Link to this

New Zealand has been taking a leading role in climate change negotiations in Sweden. We were asked to lead discussions on the critically important topic of emissions pricing to speed up the use of low-emissions technology to help the world beat global warming. This was indeed a high honour, with the other two lead speakers being China and the European Union, and it recognised the Labour-led Government’s leadership in this important area.

ChadwickSteve Chadwick Link to this

Does the Minister have any early indications of who might sign up to a post-2012 agreement?

ParkerHon DAVID PARKER Link to this

One hundred and seventy-five countries ratified Kyoto. Only three backed out of their earlier agreement: Australia, the United States, and Kazakhstan. Of course, we know what side the National Party is on. Australia and the United States have recently modified their positions—

ParkerHon DAVID PARKER Link to this

The member is quite right; we can only assume that perhaps Dr Smith takes his instructions from Kazakhstan.

SmithHon Dr Nick Smith Link to this

How will the record of his Government since 1999—which is that greenhouse gas emissions have increased by 10 million tonnes per year, an increase double the rate of what occurred during the 1990s, and one of the fastest growth rates in the developed world—how will this awful record—

ClarkRt Hon Helen Clark Link to this

Carbon neutrality.

SmithHon Dr Nick Smith Link to this

I say to the Prime Minister that it is her awful record. It does not look much like carbon neutrality to me. How will an increase of 10 million tonnes a year, which is the fastest growth rate in the developed world, help our credibility in trying to get the rest of the world to constrain its emissions?

ParkerHon DAVID PARKER Link to this

I am quite happy to contrast the record of this Government with the National Party’s position, and I really do not expect much better from the National Party. I have a quote here from Dr Smith, which I think illuminates his attitude to this issue, in which he boasts about being “at the coalface” of environmental policy. I suspect he got that from Borat, too.

BrownPeter Brown Link to this

Noting the Minister’s comments about Australia, is he aware that Australia has reduced its emissions over recent years, yet has not signed up for Kyoto, whilst, with us, it is exactly the reverse; is he aware also that Australia has recently released a detailed report on how it will effect a “cap and trade” system by the year 2012; and does he believe that this is such a serious global issue that it would be well worth our while getting involved with Australia?

ParkerHon DAVID PARKER Link to this

Australia has not reduced its emissions. Australia had the softest proposed Kyoto target of any target country in the world, which was 108 percent of emissions, an 8 percent increase in emissions over the 1990 base level—and it is not yet clear whether it will make even that 8 percent increase. It may go even higher. In respect of its proposals to develop an emissions trading scheme, I would have thought that people would be somewhat suspicious of an emissions trading scheme that is projected to be 5 years out from one of the three countries in the world that said they would not commit to their agreement.

FitzsimonsJeanette Fitzsimons Link to this

Does the Minister agree with India’s former environment secretary, Pradipto Ghosh, that it is “now up to the world to decide how big the ‘carbon pie’ should be at a certain point in the future—say, 2050—and then agree that by that date all nations should have an equal entitlement relative to their size of population.”; if he does not agree with that approach, what alternative criteria does he support for allocating emissions globally after 2012?

ParkerHon DAVID PARKER Link to this

It is clear that developed countries will have to reduce their emissions in gross terms towards the much lower levels of emissions that are coming from developing countries. But it is also true that convergence alone will not cure the problem, because if there were to be convergence at realistic levels, that would see the growth in emissions in developing countries causing global warming to reach levels that, really, no one wants to get to.

I seek leave to table a report in the Marlborough Express, in which Dr Smith said he wanted to consult on National’s environmental policy at the coalface.

Document, by leave, laid on the Table of the House.

SmithHon Dr Nick Smith Link to this

I seek leave of the House to table the Government’s actual record, which has seen a 10 million - tonne increase—

WilsonMadam SPEAKER Link to this

Leave is sought to table that document. Is there any objection? There is objection.

FitzsimonsJeanette Fitzsimons Link to this

I seek leave to table the quote from the Indian former environment secretary, which makes clear he was talking about the size of the pie—

Document, by leave, laid on the Table of the House.

Jun 2007
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
282930311
45678
1112131415
1819202122
2526272829