How often did NZ political parties agree on bills in the last parliament?

Compare party bill voting from the last parliament.

Northland Region Corrections Facility—Staff Injuries

Wednesday 6 May 2009 (advance copy) Hansard source (external site)

Cosgrove6. Hon CLAYTON COSGROVE (Labour—Waimakariri) Link to this
to the Minister of Corrections

Why did she tell the House yesterday, in respect of the incident at the Northland Region Corrections Facility, that “a number of staff received minor injuries.”?

CollinsHon JUDITH COLLINS (Minister of Corrections) Link to this

What I actually said was: “Unfortunately, a number of staff received minor injuries. The most serious injury is a suspected fractured shoulder,”. Yesterday that member claimed that five prison officers were attacked by 15 prisoners; in fact, there are three identified assailants. He claimed that a staff member suffered a smashed Achilles heel; the staff member did not. He claimed that there was double-bunking in that part of the prison; there was not. To exaggerate claims about prison incidents to score political points undermines the excellent work of our corrections officers.

CosgroveHon Clayton Cosgrove Link to this

Does the Minister dispute the Corrections Association advice that a male officer had his nose broken, a female officer dislocated her shoulder and had a ball joint in her arm broken, and another female officer seriously injured her Achilles tendon, resulting in three officers requiring hospital treatment; and does she still characterise these injuries as minor?

CollinsHon JUDITH COLLINS Link to this

I am happy to table for the House the list of injuries to staff that the Department of Corrections has provided to me—including, by the way, the comment about the supposed broken Achilles. The prison manager asked the prison officer whether her ankle was broken and whether the Achilles tendon was damaged. She replied “No.”; she has a sprained ankle. The prison officer who was reported to have received a broken nose actually sustained a bloodied nose, and he returned to full duties the following day. I am happy to table that list.

GoudieSandra Goudie Link to this

Has the Minister received any other reports regarding assaults on staff?

CollinsHon JUDITH COLLINS Link to this

Yes, I have seen a report that in the last 4 months of Mr Goff’s term as Minister of Corrections there were 36 assaults by prisoners on staff, compared to 17 in the first 4 months of this Government. In September 2006 a prisoner took a female officer hostage, requiring the armed offenders squad to intervene. In January 2007 a prison officer was set upon by four prisoners armed with weapons fashioned from knives and scissors. In May 2007, 15 youth prisoners took control of a wing at Rimutaka Prison for 5 hours, causing substantial damage to such an extent that that wing has not yet been reopened. In May 2008 a prison officer was seriously assaulted by a prisoner and required plastic surgery. In July 2008 a prison officer lost an eye following an assault by a prisoner.

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

I think the Minister has made her point fairly clearly.

CollinsHon JUDITH COLLINS Link to this

Those are very serious assaults.

CosgroveHon Clayton Cosgrove Link to this

Does the Minister consider that the injury reported by a prison officer who was a victim of the incident was minor or serious? I quote from one of the official incident information reports of 4 May 2009: “I was punched in the head, the back of the head, and chest approximately 10 times. I couldn’t identify who the prisoners were that punched me because they turned me face down on the bed. Then I got thrown out of the cell door.”

CollinsHon JUDITH COLLINS Link to this

Obviously, it is very serious whenever a prison officer is actually attacked.

CosgroveHon Clayton Cosgrove Link to this

Oh, it’s serious now? It wasn’t serious yesterday.

CollinsHon JUDITH COLLINS Link to this

The question that the member asked yesterday was about the injuries.

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

I apologise to the Minister, but I cannot hear her answer. I just ask members please to be reasonable in their interjections. I apologise to the Hon Judith Collins for interrupting.

CollinsHon JUDITH COLLINS Link to this

It is never acceptable for staff to be assaulted by prisoners, and that is one of the reasons that this Government has stamped down on prisoners collecting razor blades in their cells, which the previous Government was quite happy to have happen. It is never acceptable.

GoudieSandra Goudie Link to this

What is the Government doing to make prisons safer for staff?

CollinsHon JUDITH COLLINS Link to this

The safety of prison staff and the public is my No. 1 priority. Unlike the previous Minister of Corrections, Labour member Phil Goff, I am actually doing something about it. For example, just this week we have stopped high-security and remand prisoners from hoarding razor blades in their cells. This was a common-sense initiative that Mr Goff could have easily implemented, but chose to not be bothered to. [ Interruption]

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

Can members on both sides please be a little more reasonable.

CosgroveHon Clayton Cosgrove Link to this

Does the Minister now admit that both her description in the House yesterday of the injuries, and the description of the incident by one Warren Cummins, northern regional manager of the Department of Corrections, that “the worst you could say is they”—the prisoners—“might have thrown some peas or potatoes.”, are inaccurate, offensive, and insulting to the staff who were injured and involved?

CollinsHon JUDITH COLLINS Link to this

No. What I can say is that the complete over-rarking of this whole incident by Mr Cosgrove has undermined the excellent work in response of the Department of Corrections officers involved. I am quite happy to table as well for the House a complete rundown on the assaults on staff—exactly what happened—for the benefit of the member and the rest of the House. Every time prisoners think they are getting something over our prison officers—like that member keeps wanting to promote—they are the people who get the promotion.

CosgroveHon Clayton Cosgrove Link to this

Have any prisoners in the unit been interviewed—either internally or externally, by police or by Department of Corrections staff—or been charged, and have any procedures in the unit been changed as a result of this incident, or is it as one prison official described: “Nothing has been done in the unit. It’s as if the incident never happened. The only thing that’s changed is that some prison officers are walking around in cells with black eyes and fat lips.”?

CollinsHon JUDITH COLLINS Link to this

I prefer not to take the reports of the next Labour candidate for Tukituki into account when I am providing information to the House. I am able, however, to provide to the House—and I have already offered to do so—a full report from the Department of Corrections about the incident. The member has asked whether the police were involved; I understand that the police have been involved.

CosgroveHon Clayton Cosgrove Link to this

When will this Minister admit that she called this one wrong, and that it was a serious incident that resulted in serious injuries to officers; and will she visit the injured victims and apologise to them for her dismissive and flippant answers in the House yesterday, when she characterised those officers’ injuries as “minor”?

CollinsHon JUDITH COLLINS Link to this

I know that that member is struggling to make an impact in his shadow portfolio, but, really!

MallardHon Trevor Mallard Link to this

Point of order, Mr Speaker.

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

Point of order, the Hon Trevor Mallard.

CollinsHon JUDITH COLLINS Link to this

Three into 15 goes five times—

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

Order! A point of order has been raised by the Hon Trevor Mallard.

MallardHon Trevor Mallard Link to this

I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. I am actually going to change my points of order—to take them in a different order. The first thing is that Ministers should be addressing you, Mr Speaker, when they are answering questions. If the Minister had been doing that, she would have seen you stand and call her to order. I ask you first to rule on that. [ Interruption]

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

Members must be quiet while points of order are being dealt with. I accept the point the member makes: the Minister should have sat down and ceased answering the question when I called “Order!” and stood. In the overall scale of crimes, though, I do not think it is a hanging offence. But the member makes a perfectly valid point of order.

MallardHon Trevor Mallard Link to this

I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. The first point of order that I was going to raise relates to the first sentence of the Minister’s answer. Ministers are required, I think, at least to start with something that addresses the question. They should not introduce outside matters before they even attempt to address it.

HideHon Rodney Hide Link to this

The Hon Trevor Mallard makes a reasonable point to a degree. However, the Hon Clayton Cosgrove was clearly trying, through those questions, to make political points. If a member sets out to make political points, it is not unreasonable for the Minister to point out the political failings of the member asking the question. I suggest to the Hon Trevor Mallard that if his front bench is not up to taking a political—

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

No, no, the member must not use a point of order to criticise another party. Did the Hon Gerry Brownlee wish to add to the issue?

BrownleeHon Gerry Brownlee Link to this

I really just back up Mr Hide, in a way. You yourself, Mr Speaker, have ruled in recent weeks and on numerous occasions that if questions are loaded in a political sense, so will the answers be. [ Interruption]

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

There will be no interjections, please, while we are dealing with this matter. In normal circumstances, the point the Hon Trevor Mallard has raised is a perfectly good point: Ministers should not commence an answer to a question with a political attack on the person asking the question. That is totally outside the Standing Orders. But the other point made is certainly valid: where members asking questions make a political statement, they are likely to get a political statement back. I ask Ministers to please address the question or attempt to answer the question, rather than launch into a political attack on the questioner. But the point is well made that where members ask politically loaded questions, they are likely to get a politically loaded answer. Let us see whether we can bring a more settled atmosphere to the House today.

CosgroveHon Clayton Cosgrove Link to this

I seek leave to table an incident information report—and I note for the record that the names of the innocent have been deleted—of 4 May 2009 in which a victim of this assault notes being punched 10 times.

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

Leave is sought to table that document. Is there any objection? There is no objection.

Document, by leave, laid on the Table of the House.

CosgroveHon Clayton Cosgrove Link to this

I seek leave to table a transcript of Television One of 6 May 2009 in which Mr Warren Cummins notes that potatoes and peas were thrown in this incident.

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

I take it that it is a television transcript. The member is seeking leave to table a television transcript. Is there any objection? There is objection.

CollinsHon JUDITH COLLINS Link to this

I seek leave to table a report from the Department of Corrections on the incident—dated 4 May—and on injuries to staff.

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

Is there any objection to that document being tabled? There is objection.

MallardHon Trevor Mallard Link to this

Point of order, Mr Speaker.

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

I think the honourable member has—

MallardHon Trevor Mallard Link to this

No, she has had one. We have dealt with it. Point of order, Mr Speaker.

CollinsHon JUDITH COLLINS Link to this

No, I have another one.

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

Will both members please resume your seats. We are not going to have this. Leave was sought to table a document; the leave was denied, so that matter has been dealt with.

MallardHon Trevor Mallard Link to this

I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. I wish to make it clear to Ministers—I know that some of them are relatively inexperienced—that they do not need the permission of the House to table a document.

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

I appreciate the honourable member’s advice. I will check it out to make sure. I will seek advice right now so that the House can benefit. If we can have some silence for a moment. I apologise to the honourable member; I was not absolutely certain of the point he just raised, but the advice I have received is that a Minister, like any other member wishing to table a document, does have to seek the leave of the House to do so. I will—[ Interruption]—I am dealing with a point of order. I will check the matter further, because the honourable member has raised a perfectly sensible point as to whether Ministers have the right to simply table documents. That is fine. I will check it out further, but that is the advice I have at this moment.

CollinsHon JUDITH COLLINS Link to this

In light of that, I seek leave again to table the report from the Department of Corrections on the injuries to staff.

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

Leave is sought to table that document. Is there any objection? There is none.

Document, by leave, laid on the Table of the House.

CollinsHon JUDITH COLLINS Link to this

I seek leave to table a report from the Department of Corrections on assaults to staff. It includes a full run-down of what happened, including the 1 minute that it took for other staff to come and help.

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

Leave is sought to table that document. Is there any objection? There is none.

Document, by leave, laid on the Table of the House.

May 2009
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
272829301
45678
1112131415
1819202122
2526272829