How often did NZ political parties agree on bills in the last parliament?

Compare party bill voting from the last parliament.

Education, National Standards—Revision

Wednesday 25 November 2009 Hansard source (external site)

Mallard10. Hon TREVOR MALLARD (Labour—Hutt South) Link to this
to the Minister of Education

Was she correctly reported this morning as indicating flaws in her proposed national standards are being addressed; if so, what is the process she is using to address those flaws?

TolleyHon ANNE TOLLEY (Minister of Education) Link to this

The member must be suffering from a bit of jet lag. No.

MallardHon Trevor Mallard Link to this

Mr Speaker, are you going to deal with that, or not? [ Interruption]

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

I am on my feet. We can see what happens when members are disorderly. I say to the Minister that that response was totally out of order, and it led to disorder. That will not be tolerated.

MallardHon Trevor Mallard Link to this

Is there one published expert or academic who agrees with her view on national standards, rather than with the views of Thrupp, Crooks, Flockton, and Hattie, who have today written an open letter to her; if so, who is that academic or expert?

TolleyHon ANNE TOLLEY Link to this

Several academics have expressed support at various stages in the process. Several have been involved in their development.

KingColin King Link to this

What sector involvement was there in the development of the national standards?

TolleyHon ANNE TOLLEY Link to this

Over 4,000 principals, teachers, literacy and numeracy advisers, and other professionals attended meetings. There were 1,176 written responses from the sector, of which 490 came from groups representing, in total, 4,557 people. The education sector was also involved in an independent expert panel, which helped to develop the standards, and in the national standards reference group, which provided feedback on the draft standards.

MallardHon Trevor Mallard Link to this

If she disagrees with Thrupp, Crooks, Flockton, and Hattie, New Zealand’s four leading assessment academics, who have written to her stating inter alia that full implementation of the intended national standards system over the next 3 years is unlikely to be successful, will not achieve intended goals, and is likely to lead to dangerous side effects, why are they wrong?

TolleyHon ANNE TOLLEY Link to this

I said this morning that the academics’ concerns are being addressed. For instance, the Ministry of Education is working on how schools can report on children’s progress and achievement in relation to the New Zealand curriculum. Professor John Hattie himself is participating in this work. I say to that member that parents want this proposal, and they want national standards—

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

I always get concerned when Ministers start with “I say to that member”, because it invariably means they are no longer answering the question. The Minister answered the question, and that is sufficient.

MallardHon Trevor Mallard Link to this

I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. I hate to disagree with the ruling you have just made as to whether the Minister has sufficiently answered the question, but I do not think she actually got to the question about the specifics of why she disagrees with those four experts.

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

The Minister did point out that she did not disagree totally with the experts, and that in fact one of the experts was involved in working on the scheme to address issues that were of concern. I believe that that was a perfectly fair answer to the question.

MallardHon Trevor Mallard Link to this

Was her reading of this picture book to a group of secondary school teachers designed to be evidence of her ability to meet literacy standards, and was she describing her position with the line about rats having a better life, or was she telling teachers that the final line, “You have to be happy with a lot less.”, applies to them?

TolleyHon ANNE TOLLEY Link to this

I suggest that that member reads the book. It is a great read. [ Interruption]

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

Interjections that are nasty are not helpful, at all. I ask the House to just take a deep breath.

Nov 2009
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
23456
910111213
1617181920
2324252627
301234