How often did NZ political parties agree on bills in the last parliament?

Compare party bill voting from the last parliament.

Workforce Advisory Group—Release of Report

Wednesday 23 June 2010 Hansard source (external site)

Peachey7. ALLAN PEACHEY (National—Tāmaki) Link to this
to the Minister of Education

Why has she released the report of her workforce advisory group for public discussion?

TolleyHon ANNE TOLLEY (Minister of Education) Link to this

Last year I appointed a workforce advisory group to give me independent expert advice on the future of the teaching workforce. The group has produced a report called A Vision for the Teaching Profession, which I released earlier this month. I have released the report because I believe that this is a great opportunity to have an open discussion about how we can attract and train the very best teachers and ensure that they stay in the profession.

PeacheyAllan Peachey Link to this

How can interested people have their say on the proposals in the report?

TolleyHon ANNE TOLLEY Link to this

Submissions can be sent to the Ministry of Education by mail or email until 6 August. The report and a discussion document have been made directly available to schools and education sector groups. Both documents are also available to the wider public online. The Government will consider the advisory group report and outcomes of this consultation process later this year.

MallardHon Trevor Mallard Link to this

Has she read and understood the report; if so, what was the main recommendation?

TolleyHon ANNE TOLLEY Link to this

Yes, I have read and understood the report, and I have released it along with a discussion document asking for public input.

MallardHon Trevor Mallard Link to this

I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. It was a pretty simple question: I asked what the main recommendation was.

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

In fairness, I think that, unlike the question asked by the Leader of the Opposition yesterday, this question had two parts. The first question asked whether she had read and understood it; the second question asked what the main recommendations were. The Minister chose to say that she had read it and understood it, which meant that she had chosen to answer the first part.

MallardHon Trevor Mallard Link to this

Does she agree with the main recommendation of the Education Workforce Advisory Group that 3 years is not long enough to do a quality basic teacher education programme?

TolleyHon ANNE TOLLEY Link to this

I realise it comes as some surprise to the Opposition, but one releases a report with a discussion document for public consultation in order to get other people’s input into an issue. That is exactly what we have done. I do not want to pre-empt that public discussion about a very important issue like the training of our teaching force.

MallardHon Trevor Mallard Link to this

I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. I took your advice from the previous question and I asked, I think, the straightest question I could: I asked whether she agreed with it. She could have said that she did not have an opinion, that she agreed with it, or that she did not agree with it—

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

The Minister’s answer was that her opinion was that it was not in the public interest for her to comment on it prior to getting feedback from the public. The Minister is perfectly at liberty to answer in that way.

Jun 2010
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
311234
7891011
1415161718
2122232425
28293012