How often did NZ political parties agree on bills in the last parliament?

Compare party bill voting from the last parliament.

Tourism—Overlander Rail Service

Thursday 24 August 2006 Hansard source (external site)

Fitzsimons1. JEANETTE FITZSIMONS (Co-Leader—Green) Link to this
to the Minister of Finance

Can he confirm that tourism is our major export earner; if so, does he wish to review his comment in the House yesterday that “We do not export anything via the Overlander.”?

CullenHon Dr MICHAEL CULLEN (Minister of Finance) Link to this

Yes, it is, only because of course agricultural exports are not combined; they are disaggregated. If they were combined, then easily agricultural exports would be our largest export earner. No, I do not wish to revise my answer from yesterday. The key word there is “via”. I was referring to the carrying of New Zealand goods to the market.

FitzsimonsJeanette Fitzsimons Link to this

Is he aware of a 400 percent increase in passengers, largely tourists, achieved on the Tranz Alpine line as a result of good marketing, and what will he do to help negotiate a package that will help the Overlander to achieve the same success?

CullenHon Dr MICHAEL CULLEN Link to this

I appear to have done so already. The announcement of the closure of the Overlander has led to a large increase in bookings until the point of closure.

BrownPeter Brown Link to this

Will the Minister take this opportunity of clarifying his position: will he seriously consider a proposal from Toll that requires a modest subsidy for a short period of time, providing he receives a properly constructed business plan?

CullenHon Dr MICHAEL CULLEN Link to this

In the extraordinarily unlikely event that Toll made that offer, I would seriously consider it. What I have received is an offer of an ongoing, in perpetuity, subsidy, which, given our experience with the current contracts on rail access, would no doubt be sought to being revised subsequently in Toll’s favour very substantially.

KedgleySue Kedgley Link to this

How does the loss of the only long-distance passenger rail service in the North Island fit in with the Government’s National Rail Strategy, which commits the Government to “retaining the existing rail network” and “maximising the use of rail transport in New Zealand”; and why would the Government not consider a 2-year package such as has been proposed by the Green Party, rather than an indefinite subsidy?

CullenHon Dr MICHAEL CULLEN Link to this

I thank the Green Party for its offer, but it is not Toll. Toll has not made that offer.

BrownPeter Brown Link to this

Would the Minister consider subsidising the service at a modest level for a short period of time if he receives a properly constructed business plan from an additional operator, other than Toll?

CullenHon Dr MICHAEL CULLEN Link to this

In order for that to happen, the Overlander service must cease. That is part of the conditions of the current track access agreement with Toll.

BrownPeter Brown Link to this

I raise a point of order, Madam Speaker. I think we accept that the Overlander service will cease, but I am asking a specific question: would the Minister receive positively a proposal from another operator, albeit a few weeks or months after the Overlander service ceases?

WilsonMadam SPEAKER Link to this

That is not a point of order, but the Minister may wish to add to his answer.

CullenHon Dr MICHAEL CULLEN Link to this

I am happy to comment further. I have not yet ruled out any further renegotiation with Toll. Mr Mike Lee of the Auckland Regional Council met with Toll today. Apparently at that meeting no progress was made, but Mr Lee is continuing work. I will certainly consider any approach around a new tourism-based venture that looks to have a likely chance of success, but I think also those regional councils that have been showing an interest should also come to the party. Everybody is keen to spend the Government’s money and to offer it up on their own platter.

LockeKeith Locke Link to this

Will the Minister admit that he was wrong yesterday to complain about the Auckland Regional Council charging $200,000 a year for the Overlander to be at the Britomart rail terminal, when the council said today that it has subsidised the Britomart access fee from between $95,000 to $122,000 a year, and will he discuss with the Auckland, Waikato, Manawatū, and Wellington regional councils their proposal for a joint Government - local government financial rescue package to keep the service going while its long-term viability can be established?

CullenHon Dr MICHAEL CULLEN Link to this

In answer to the first part of the question, yes. As to the second part, I have received no proposal from regional councils to subsidise the Overlander. I have received proposals that we should subsidise the Overlander.

KedgleySue Kedgley Link to this

I seek leave to table the Government’s National Rail Strategy, with its commitment to retaining the existing network and maximising the use of rail transport.

Document, by leave, laid on the Table of the House.

LockeKeith Locke Link to this

I seek leave to table a statement issued today by Mike Lee, the chairman of the Auckland Regional Council, which proposes a joint financial rescue package that I presume both Government and local government would contribute to in order to save the Overlander service.

Document, by leave, laid on the Table of the House.

Aug 2006
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
311234
7891011
1415161718
2122232425
282930311