How often did NZ political parties agree on bills in the last parliament?

Compare party bill voting from the last parliament.

Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples—Government Position

Tuesday 31 March 2009 Hansard source (external site)

Delahunty12. CATHERINE DELAHUNTY (Green) Link to this
to the Minister of Foreign Affairs

Will he follow the example of Australia and change the Government’s position to support the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples?

KeyHon JOHN KEY (Acting Minister of Foreign Affairs) Link to this

Australia has recently reviewed its stance on the declaration, and an announcement on its new approach is expected on Friday. This Government will look at the way the Australian Government interprets the declaration and see whether its interpretation may be applicable to New Zealand, but I cannot comment until we have seen what the Australians are saying about their support.

DelahuntyCatherine Delahunty Link to this

How can the Government reconcile supporting the flying of a Māori flag on Waitangi Day while still prevaricating on recognising the collective human rights of Māori as affirmed in the UN declaration; or is the Government all symbolism and no action?

KeyHon JOHN KEY Link to this

I think that in general New Zealand has worked hard in the last 30 years to recognise the rights of indigenous people. This Government has been working very hard to recognise the rights of indigenous people. Flying the flag on the Auckland Harbour Bridge, working so collaboratively with the Māori Party, and ensuring that the Waitangi Tribunal and the whole Waitangi settlement process is properly funded are all good examples of us working for the rights of indigenous people.

CullenHon Dr Michael Cullen Link to this

Can the Minister confirm that the Government’s position to date has essentially been that if the declaration can be taken to have significant meaning then that meaning cannot actually be enforced by the New Zealand Government, and therefore it has determined not to sign it, but if the declaration can be interpreted to not have any great significant meaning then the Government might be prepared to sign it?

KeyHon JOHN KEY Link to this

Yes, the declaration is not legally binding; it is an aspirational goal. I think that New Zealand has done a lot for the rights of indigenous people, but let us see what the Australians do on Friday and what caveats they put around their support.

DelahuntyCatherine Delahunty Link to this

Is it right to prevaricate on the recognition of both an aspirational goal and the recognition of the collective human rights of Māori when this Government is dependent on the support of the Māori Party?

KeyHon JOHN KEY Link to this

We are not prevaricating. Firstly, it will be interesting to see, if the Australians make an announcement on Friday, what caveats they put around that support for the declaration. As I said earlier, it is an aspirational, non-binding declaration. From this Government’s point of view, we take the rights of indigenous people seriously and we are working hard to advance those rights.

Catherine Delahunty: I seek leave to table the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

Leave is sought to table the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Is there any objection to that public document being tabled?

Document, by leave, laid on the Table of the House.

Mar 2009
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
23456
910111213
1617181920
2324252627
3031123