How often did NZ political parties agree on bills in the last parliament?

Compare party bill voting from the last parliament.

Foreshore and Seabed Act Review—Te Puni Kōkiri Advice on Recent Proposals

Tuesday 15 June 2010 Hansard source (external site)

Horomia7. Hon PAREKURA HOROMIA (Labour—Ikaroa-Rāwhiti) Link to this
to the Minister of Maori Affairs

Has he received any reports from Te Puni Kōkiri on the benefits for Māori in having foreshore and seabed vested in “public space” rather than Crown ownership?

SharplesHon Dr PITA SHARPLES (Minister of Māori Affairs) Link to this

I have received advice from Te Puni Kōkiri on various aspects of the proposed replacement regime for the Foreshore and Seabed Act, including advice on different ownership options, and how this new regime will restore the mana and dignity to Māori that was removed in the 2004 Act.

HoromiaHon Parekura Horomia Link to this

Does he agree with the Hon Tariana Turia, who described vesting the foreshore and seabed in Crown ownership as confiscation; if so, how is vesting it in public space any different from that—and is it outer space, inner space, or lost in space?

SharplesHon Dr PITA SHARPLES Link to this

There is a big difference between Crown ownership and non-ownership—a big difference.

HoromiaHon Parekura Horomia Link to this

Does he agree with MP Hone Harawira that the process being used is “bullshit” and pandering to the rednecks; if not, why not?

FlavellTe Ururoa Flavell Link to this

I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. The Minister has no responsibility for members of our party, and in that case that question is out of order.

MallardHon Trevor Mallard Link to this

Speaking to the point of order—

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

No, I do not need to hear any further on the matter. [ Interruption] I am on my feet. Traditionally, members are able to ask Ministers whether they agree with the views of other people, as long as the view that is being expressed is about a matter that is very much the Minister’s responsibility. If the matter is not the Minister’s responsibility, then it is up to the Minister to tell the House that. Being asked whether he agrees with an opinion on a matter is, I believe, in order, but the matter that the opinion relates to must be the Minister’s responsibility.

HarawiraHone Harawira Link to this

Hoi anō, e tū ana au kia whakatēpungia te pānui o te hīkoi takutai moana mai i te tau 2004, me tōna karanga ki te kāwanatanga o Reipa, kia kaua e pāhi i te ture tāhae takutai moana.

[I seek leave to table a notice regarding the foreshore and seabed march in 2004 that calls for the Labour Government not to pass the thieving foreshore bill.]

Anei nā taku pānui.

[Here indeed is my notice.]

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

I apologise to the honourable member. I did not pick up the interpretation.

HarawiraHone Harawira Link to this

Māku e whakapākehātia. I will translate.

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

I appreciate that.

HarawiraHone Harawira Link to this

I seek leave to table the pamphlet of the 2004 foreshore and seabed hīkoi, calling upon the Labour Government to withdraw its foreshore and seabed legislation.

SmithMr SPEAKER Link to this

Leave is sought to table that document. Is there any objection? There is no objection.

Document, by leave, laid on the Table of the House.

Jun 2010
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
311234
7891011
1415161718
2122232425
28293012